Whether consolidation of three separate cases without a motion and overriding by another judge is legal and ethical

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Three cases bearing individual case index numbers, CV-092419-11/QU, CV-027168-12/QU, CV-032361-12/QU, court fees paid, different filing dates, grandfathered, at bench trials more than ten times each, without going for final trial, and not permitted to be consolidated according to decisions of earlier judges, as each case was different, of different matters and subjects, is it legal and ethical for these cases to be consolidated without -a motion, and to be overridden by another judge of the same ranking and same court? ' 2. When a case index number was earlier consolidated into case index number 092419-11/QU, and a decision by Hon. Judge Leslie J. Purification on 8-10-2012 to be put back on trial calendar for final trial, is it legal that this case be dismissed incorrectly in bench trial, and not permitted to go to final trial? 3. When a fresh lawyer appears for the first time at court for a hearing for the defendants, without any material or facts of the case, and asks the appellant for copies, without obtaining the required papers from the _ previous council, and the Appellant refuses, as the briefs run into more than 1000 pages, and the fresh lawyer for the defendant has not filed a notice of appearance, and the Judge Hon. Jodi Orlow removes the Appellant’s briefs, and gives them away to the personanon-grata, even though he has not filed notice of appearance, is this a case of Judicial misconduct, as the person who was given all Appellant’s papers in an ; ii QUESTIONS PRESENTED -— Continued active case, consisting of evidence, motions, and originals took them away from the protection of the court, ; leaving Appellant’s dossier of the case empty, jeopardizing his chances at future trial. Is this a blatant denial of Appellant’s basic right to justice, by a sitting judge of the civil court of Queens, New York? 4. Atan Examination before trial, is it not incumbent on the court to educate the subject of an EBT about the procedures and protocols of an EBT, especially if that : ; person is not a lawyer, and Pro Se? 5. Atan EBT is it not incumbent for the lawyer doing the questioning, to reference his questions and correlate it with the definite Case index number of the case in question, rather than a vague reference of his own as A, B, C etc.? 6. Atan Examination before trial, is it legally correct for a lawyer (Kenneth R. Tuch) from the law firm of Pike and Pike PC, Bellmore, New York, to almost assault the subject of an EBT, by putting his middle fin; ger in the face of the subject, yelling, and using vulgar language, which was not dutifully recorded by the stenographer, who was a friend of the lawyer conducting the EBT? ; 7. Isit legal procedure that all exhibits that are submitted by the person undergoing the EBT, be permit, ted to have copies of the same papers stamped by the lawyer conducting the EBT, or else be pre-empted from introducing this material at trial? iii QUESTIONS PRESENTED Continued 8. If an EBT has not been completed, for any reason, whatsoever, is it possible or legal to consider that the EBT would continue at a later date and that it is “incomplete?” until completion? 9. Is there a law that states that an Appellant can have his case dismissed on the strength of an incomplete EBT? 10. An EBT is a form of obtaining discovery, and if defendants have never responded to requests for discovery, can their cases be dismissed for not providing discovery? 11. Senator Rubio, in a presidential debate on December 15, 2015, stated that all one has to do to collect : evidence for the past five years is to issue a subpoena for the same. Appellant had filed a subpoena Duces Tecum for the return of his briefs and evidence consisting of over 500 pages that were given away in a case of Judicial misconduct by Hon. Judge Jodi Orlow to a person who was present at bench trial without filing notice of appearance. To be returned well in advance of the pending trial date. , The defendant counsel was in contemp