No. 18-1022

Julius Jerome Murphy v. Texas

Lower Court: Texas
Docketed: 2019-02-05
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Experienced Counsel
Tags: brady-v-maryland brady-violation criminal-procedure death-penalty due-process eighth-amendment habeas-corpus witness-testimony
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess Punishment HabeasCorpus Securities JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2019-05-23
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the State's failure to disclose threats and promises made to witnesses violated due process

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. Whether the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals misapplied established federal law when it held that the State’s failure to disclose threats and promises made to two critical witnesses in exchange for their testimony did not violate petitioner Julius Murphy’s due process rights. II. Whether the trial court’s arbitrary refusal to continue Murphy’s habeas hearing violated his due process rights. III. Whether the death penalty violates the Eighth Amendment. (i)

Docket Entries

2019-05-28
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/23/2019.
2019-05-01
Reply of petitioner Julius Jerome Murphy filed.
2019-04-18
Brief of respondent Texas in opposition filed.
2019-03-28
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including April 19, 2019.
2019-03-26
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 5, 2019 to April 19, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-03-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 5, 2019.
2019-02-28
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 7, 2019 to April 5, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-02-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 7, 2019)

Attorneys

Julius Jerome Murphy
Catherine Emily StetsonHogan Lovells US LLP, Petitioner
Catherine Emily StetsonHogan Lovells US LLP, Petitioner
Texas
Jefferson David ClendeninOffice of the Attorney General of Texas, Respondent
Jefferson David ClendeninOffice of the Attorney General of Texas, Respondent