No. 18-1026

William Kinney, et ux. v. Anderson Lumber Company, Inc., et al.

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-02-06
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: anti-trust antitrust-law-sherman-act concurrent-jurisdiction due-process due-process-clause equal-protection fourteenth-amendment religious-freedom religious-freedom-restoration-act sherman-antitrust-act unlicensed-practice-of-law
Key Terms:
Antitrust DueProcess FirstAmendment Securities
Latest Conference: 2019-04-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Tennessee's law for the unlicensed practice of law violates the Sherman Anti-Trust Act and the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED: 1. Whether Tennessee’s law for the unlicensed practice of law violates the Sherman Anti-Trust Act by restraining free market trade and competition without mandatory State oversight. 2. Whether Tennessee’s law for the unlicensed practice of law is vague or over . broad, depriving citizens of their rights without fair process, thus violating the due process clause and the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. 3. Whether the application of Tennessee’s UPL law by Federal Courts in concurrent jurisdictions violates the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, 42 U.S. Code § 2000bb.

Docket Entries

2019-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.
2019-02-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 8, 2019)

Attorneys

William Kinney, et al.
William Kinney — Petitioner
William Kinney — Petitioner