No. 18-1040

Licong Li v. Sofia Dang

Lower Court: Illinois
Docketed: 2019-02-08
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: child-custody crimes-against-humanity divorce divorce-proceedings due-process family-law fundamental-rights human-made-tragedies human-rights parental-rights visitation
Key Terms:
ERISA
Latest Conference: 2019-04-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)

How long would crimes against humanity in terms of child custody and visitation in divorce cases be allowed to continue in this country?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Questions Presented for Review e How long would crimes against humanity in terms of child custody and visitation in divorce cases be allowed to continue in this country? ¢ How long would fundamental right violation in terms of child custody and visitation in divorce cases be allowed to continue in this country? ¢ How long would human-made tragedies in terms of child custody and visitation in divorce cases be allowed to continue in this country? e Is divorce in the US between father and his minor children as well as between children’s parents? e¢ How could children be separated from their father during divorce proceedings without any hearings? e Do children have fundamental rights to their father in a divorce between their parents? e Does father have fundamental rights to his children during and after divorce? ¢ How could court facilitate separation of father from his minor children? e How could court spend most of the time trying to separate father from his children during a divorce case? e How could court assist mother to seek divorce of children from their father? e Does court have rights of severing the relationship between father and his children? e How could system allow children to be manipulated by a parent during and after divorce? e How could court completely disregard children’s best interests? e How could father’s fundamental right for custody settlement negotiations be denied? i {

Docket Entries

2019-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.
2019-03-05
Waiver of right of respondent Sofia Dang to respond filed.
2018-12-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 11, 2019)
2018-09-12
Application (18A258) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until December 8, 2018.
2018-09-05
Application (18A258) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 9, 2018 to December 8, 2018, submitted to Justice Kagan.

Attorneys

Licong Li
Licong Li — Petitioner
Licong Li — Petitioner
Sofia Dang
Michael A. BiederstadtBiederstadt Law, P.C., Respondent
Michael A. BiederstadtBiederstadt Law, P.C., Respondent