No. 18-1074
Brian Perryman v. Josue Romero, et al.
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights class-action class-action-settlement class-counsel cy-pres cy-pres-award due-process fair-reasonable-adequate fairness-standard fees rule-23 settlement settlement-scrutiny
Latest Conference:
2019-06-20
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether, or in what circumstances, a cy pres award that provides no direct relief or benefit to class members comports with the Rule 23(e) requirement that a settlement binding class members must be "fair, reasonable, and adequate."
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the cy pres award that provides no direct relief or benefit to class members comports with the Rule 23(e) requirement that a settlement binding class members must be 'fair, reasonable, and adequate'
Docket Entries
2019-06-24
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-24
Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Center for Individual Rights GRANTED.
2019-06-19
Letter from counsel for respondents Josue Romero, et al. regarding suggestion of bankruptcy of respondent Provide Commerce, Inc. received.
2019-06-19
Letter from counsel for petitioner regarding suggestion of bankruptcy of respondent Provide Commerce, Inc. received. (Distributed)
2019-06-18
Letter from counsel for respondents Josue Romero, et al. regarding suggestion of bankruptcy of respondent Provide Commerce, Inc. received. (Distributed)
2019-06-11
Suggestion of bankruptcy of respondent Provide Commerce, Inc. received from counsel for respondent. (Distributed)
2019-06-07
Reply of petitioner Brian Perryman filed. (Distributed)
2019-06-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/20/2019.
2019-05-31
Brief of respondent Provide Commerce, Inc. in opposition filed.
2019-05-31
Brief of respondents Josue Romero, et al. in opposition filed.
2019-05-20
Letter of May 20, 2019 from counsel from petitioner waiving the 14-day waiting period under Rule 15.5 filed.
2019-05-15
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted in part and the time is extended to and including May 31, 2019, for all respondents.
2019-05-10
Reply in support of motion from respondent Provide Commerce, Inc. filed.
2019-05-10
Letter of May 10, 2019, from counsel for respondents Josue Romero, et al. in support of motion for extension of time filed.
2019-05-10
Response to motion from petitioner Brian Perryman filed.
2019-05-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 23, 2019 to June 24, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-04-23
Response Requested. (Due May 23, 2019)
2019-04-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2019.
2019-04-01
Waiver of right of respondents Josue Romero, et al. to respond filed.
2019-03-18
Waiver of right of respondent Provide Commerce, Inc. to respond filed.
2019-03-15
Brief amici curiae of The Attorneys General of Arizona, et al. filed.
2019-03-14
Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Center for Individual Rights.
2019-03-07
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 17, 2019.
2019-03-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 18, 2019 to April 17, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-02-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 18, 2019)
2018-12-11
Application (18A608) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until February 13, 2019.
2018-12-07
Application (18A608) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 1, 2019 to February 13, 2019, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
Brian Perryman
Theodore Harold Frank — Hamilton Lincoln Law Institute, Petitioner
Center for Individual Rights
Josue Romero, et al.
Deepak Gupta — Gupta Wessler PLLC, Respondent
Provide Commerce, Inc.
Michael Graham Rhodes — Cooley LLP, Respondent
States of Arizona