Whether a State Supreme Court with only appellate jurisdiction can exercise personal jurisdiction without proper service of process, take subject matter jurisdiction beyond its constitutional authority, hold secret hearings, accept inadmissible hearsay evidence, and allow conflicts of interest

QUESTION PRESENTED May a State Supreme Court that is granted only appellate jurisdiction asa matter of law by the state constitution: : 1. Exercise personal jurisdiction without service of process on Petitioner | which included no notice of charges, no hearing and no opportunity to be heard? 2. Take unto itself subject matter jurisdiction over an issue through some vague belief in the inherent powers of the State Supreme Court to exceed its constitutional authority by acting as a court of original jurisdiction? . 3. Hold a secret hearing in absentia, allowing only prosecutorial submissions of evidence and issue a decision based on these submissions? .4. Accept the General Counsel of the State Bar’s unsupported word (hearsay) as evidence which was in turn based on a forged document that was not ’ submitted to the court and was not even legally admissible in any court in the state under Georgia state law? 5. Accept a conflict of interest in which those acting as prosecutors, the members of the Office of General Counsel of the State Bar, were actually employees of the Court, while denying Petitioner the right to have representatives at said secret hearing or to even know about the hearing? : LISTS OF PARTIES : . ran lace “ . Pow 4.5 . The following is a list of all