No. 18-1078
James Dawson, et al. v. Joshua Brennan
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (9)
Tags: 4th-amendment circuit-split curtilage fourth-amendment law-enforcement probation probation-condition probation-conditions search-and-seizure sixth-circuit
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment Privacy
FourthAmendment Privacy
Latest Conference:
2020-06-11
(distributed 9 times)
Related Cases:
18-913
(Vide)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Sixth Circuit misapplied Supreme Court precedent on Fourth Amendment curtilage, creating circuit split
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Did the Sixth Circuit misapply this Court’s authority and create a conflict among Circuits by holding that a law enforcement officer violates the Fourth Amendment by entering the rear curtilage of a home in attempting to gain the resident’s compliance with his probation condition?
Docket Entries
2020-06-15
Petition DENIED.
2020-06-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/11/2020.
2020-06-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/4/2020.
2020-05-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/28/2020.
2020-05-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/21/2020.
2020-05-13
Rescheduled.
2020-04-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2020.
2020-01-08
Rescheduled.
2020-01-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-12-11
Rescheduled.
2019-11-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/13/2019.
2019-11-08
Brief of respondent Joshua Brennan in opposition filed.
2019-10-15
Response Requested. (Due November 14, 2019)
2019-10-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/18/2019.
2019-05-22
Rescheduled.
2019-05-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/30/2019.
2019-03-19
Waiver of right of respondent Joshua Brennan to respond filed.
2019-02-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 21, 2019)
Attorneys
James Dawson, et al.
Joshua Brennan
Tillman J. Breckenridge — Breckenridge PLLC, Respondent
Tillman J. Breckenridge — Breckenridge PLLC, Respondent