Whether a State may obtain a criminal conviction and 37-year prison sentence against a defendant where the primary evidence of guilt was a wire-recording that the defendant and jurors were not permitted to hear, but instead whose contents were summarized by the arresting officer

QUESTION PRESENTED May a State, consistent with due process, obtain a criminal conviction and 37-year prison sentence against a criminal defendant where the primary evidence of the defendant’s guilt was a wire-recording that the defendant nor the jurors at the defendant’s trial were permitted to hear, but instead whose contents were summarized by the defendant’s arresting officer?