Whether the Court should overrule its holdings in Regents of the University of California v. Bakke and Grutier v. Bollinger that professional school admissions decisions are constitutionally protected expression

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Court should overrule its holdings in Regents of the University of California v. Bakke and Grutier v. Bollinger that professional school admissions decisions are constitutionally protected expression. (i) li PARTIES TO THE CASE The parties to the case are Samuel Pierce, Petitioner and Yale University, the Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania, and the American Association of Medical Colleges, Respondents.