No. 18-1113

Jeffrey Gray Thomas v. Laurie Zelon, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-02-26
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: appellate-review civil-procedure civil-rights civil-rights-complaint district-court-dismissal due-process federal-circuit-court federal-jurisdiction free-speech judicial-precedent rooker-feldman rooker-feldman-doctrine standing
Key Terms:
ERISA DueProcess Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2019-04-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in affirming the dismissal of the federal civil rights complaint under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Did the Ninth Federal Circuit Court of Appeals Err in Affirming the District Court’s Dismissal of the federal civil rights complaint under the Rubric of RookerFeldman (Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co. (1923) 263 U. S. 413 and District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman (1983) 460 U.S, 462)? J p. i— Petition for the Writ of Certiorari in Thomas v. Zelon et al.

Docket Entries

2019-07-15
Rehearing DENIED.
2019-06-20
DISTRIBUTED.
2019-05-22
2019-04-29
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/26/2019.
2019-03-29
Waiver of right of respondent Hugh John Gibson to respond filed.
2019-03-27
Waiver of right of respondent Rosario Perry to respond filed.
2018-12-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 28, 2019)

Attorneys

Hugh John Gibson
Raul Luis MartinezLewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP, Respondent
Jeffrey Gray Thomas
Jeffrey G. Thomas — Petitioner
Rosario Perry
Rosario PerryRosario Perry, A Professional Law Corporation, Respondent