No. 18-1116
Intel Corporation Investment Policy Committee, et al. v. Christopher M. Sulyma
Tags: actual-knowledge breach breach-of-fiduciary-duty disclosure disclosure-requirements employee-retirement employee-retirement-income-security-act erisa erisa-statute-of-limitations fiduciary-duty limitations-period retirement-plans statute-of-limitations statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Arbitration ERISA ClassAction JusticiabilityDoctri
Arbitration ERISA ClassAction JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2019-06-06
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the three-year limitations period in Section 413(2) of ERISA bars suit where all relevant information was disclosed to the plaintiff more than three years before filing, but the plaintiff chose not to read or could not recall the information
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the three-year limitations period in Section 413(2) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, 29 U.S.C. 1113(2), which runs from “the earliest date on which the plaintiff had actual knowledge of the breach or violation,” bars suit where all of the relevant information was disclosed to the plaintiff by the defendants more than three years before the plaintiff filed the complaint, but the plaintiff chose not to read or could not recall having read the information.
Docket Entries
2020-03-30
JUDGMENT ISSUED.
2020-02-26
Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Alito, J., delivered the <a href = 'https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/18-1116_h3cj.pdf'>opinion</a> for a unanimous Court.
2019-12-04
Argued. For petitioners: Donald B. Verrilli, Jr., Washington, D. C. For respondent: Matthew W.H. Wessler, Washington, D. C.; and Matthew Guarnieri, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.)
2019-11-20
Reply of petitioners Intel Corporation Investment Policy Committee, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2019-11-12
Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.
2019-10-28
Brief amicus curiae of The Pension Rights Center filed (October 29, 2019). (Distributed)
2019-10-28
Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.
2019-10-28
Brief amici curiae of AARP and AARP Foundation filed. (Distributed)
2019-10-28
Brief amicus curiae of United States filed. (Distributed)
2019-10-25
CIRCULATED
2019-10-23
Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit.
2019-10-21
Brief of respondent Christopher M. Sulyma filed.
2019-09-13
SET FOR ARGUMENT on Wednesday, December 4, 2019.
2019-08-28
Brief amici curiae of The National Association of Manufacturers, et al. filed.
2019-08-21
Brief of petitioners Intel Corporation Investment Policy Committee, et al. filed.
2019-08-21
Joint appendix (2 volumes) filed.
2019-08-21
Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Intel Corporation Investment Policy Committee, et al.
2019-06-27
Joint motion for an extension of time to file the briefs on the merits granted. The time to file the joint appendix and petitioners' brief on the merits is extended to and including August 21, 2019. The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including October 21, 2019.
2019-06-17
Joint motion for an extension of time to file the briefs on the merits filed.
2019-06-10
Petition GRANTED.
2019-06-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/6/2019.
2019-05-14
Reply of petitioners Intel Corporation Investment Policy Committee, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2019-05-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/30/2019.
2019-04-29
Brief of respondent Christopher M. Sulyma in opposition filed.
2019-03-28
Brief amici curiae of The National Association of Manufacturers, et al. filed.
2019-03-21
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 29, 2019.
2019-03-18
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 28, 2019 to April 27, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-02-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 28, 2019)
Attorneys
AARP and AARP Foundation
Dara Swartz Smith — AARP Foundation Litigation, Amicus
Christopher M. Sulyma
Matthew W.H. Wessler — Gupta Wessler PLLC, Respondent
Intel Corporation Investment Policy Committee, et al.
Donald B. Verrilli Jr. — Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, Petitioner
The National Association of Manufacturers, et al.
Mark Andrew Perry — Gibson Dunn & Crutcher, LLP, Amicus
The Pension Rights Center
Elizabeth Hopkins — Kantor & Kantor, LLP, Amicus
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Amicus