No. 18-1126

Mufasa Wilson Sejour v. United States

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2019-02-28
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: commerce-clause criminal-law due-process federal-jurisdiction federal-prosecution hobbs-act interstate-commerce jurisdictional-reach local-business robbery sentencing
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2019-03-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Robbery-of-local-gas-station-for-$200-prosecuted-under-Hobbs-Act

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW In today's world, there is no such thing as a purely local business. All businesses use credit card machines, access the internet, and _ purchase out-of-state goods. That does not mean that every robbery affects interstate commerce. The facts of this case involve an 18-year old with no prior convictions who robbed a local gas station for $200. The Eleventh Circuit determined that the robbery affected interstate commerce and could be prosecuted federally under the Hobbs Act because the gasoline and beer at the gas station originated from out of state. The question presented here is whether a robbery of a local gas station involving $200 is covered by the federal Hobbs Act simply because the store received its gasoline and beer from out of state.

Docket Entries

2019-04-01
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/29/2019.
2019-03-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-02-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 1, 2019)

Attorneys

Mufasa Wilson Sejour
David Oscar MarkusMarkus/Moss PLLC, Petitioner
David Oscar MarkusMarkus/Moss PLLC, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent