No. 18-114
G. Russell Rollyson, Jr., in His Official and Individual Capacity v. Jeffrey O'Neal, et ux.
Tags: constitutional-duty due-process notice notice-requirements property-rights qualified-immunity service-of-notice state-auditor statutory-interpretation tax-deed tax-lien tax-lien-purchaser
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2018-10-05
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a Deputy State Auditor is entitled to qualified immunity because no previous court had interpreted the State's statutory scheme as imposing the burden to perfect constitutional service of the notice to redeem upon the State
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
question presented is: 1. Whether a Deputy State Auditor is entitled to qualified immunity because no previous court had interpreted the State’s statutory scheme as imposing the burden to _ perfect constitutional service of the notice to redeem upon the State?
Docket Entries
2018-10-05
Petition Dismissed - Rule 46.
2018-10-04
Stipulation to dismiss the petition for a writ of certiorari pursuant to Rule 46.1 filed.
2018-09-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/5/2018.
2017-07-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 27, 2018)
Attorneys
G. Russell Rollyson, Jr.
Charles R. Bailey — Bailey & Wyant, PLLC, Petitioner
Jeffrey O'Neal, et ux.
Gary M. Smith — Mountain State Justice, Respondent