Whether the United States Supreme Court has set a precedence that contradicts its own precedence's

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. This case is of first impression which strongly changes the process of ruling as guided by the US Constitution for every single court in the United States of America. 2. As demonstrated in this case, The United States Supreme Court, under the doctrine of equitable maxim, has stated that a trial court enjoys a certain self imposed ordinance of broad discretion to disregard any and all precedence’s developed by any appeals court, including the United States Supreme Court, and to disregard the United States Constitution, and its own State Constitution along with The Object Principle Of Justice. 3. Furthermore, and in addition, every single court in the USA _ unconstitutionally disregards the doctrine of The Object Principle of Justice which is the supreme law of the land. The United States Constitution requires the enforcement of this doctrine. This doctrine is the bedrock in making our ‘ courts the most highly respected, loved and admired ; judicial system above anything the world has ever before seen. Parties in court would have a strong sense of the outcome, our courts would no longer be so dangerously precarious, and as such the filing of lawsuits and appeals would drop dramatically while greatly increasing settlements. 4. In addition, under the guidance of The Object Principle of Justice, it would dispel the bad labeling ii of judges and attorneys. No longer would “We the People . . .” be faced with either losing their moral sense of justice or losing respect for our judicial system. The bells of justice would ring louder, greater, more effectively than ever before while attorneys and judges would be revered like never before seen. QUESTIONS PRESENTED : 5. Whether the United States Supreme Court has set a precedence, under the doctrine of equitable maxim, that contradicts its own precedence’s by : freely giving broad discretion to a trial court to; 1) disregard the Fourteenth Amendment, and Articles III and VI to the United States Constitution, and 2) to disregards it’s own State Constitution, which in this case would be Article 1 Section 7 & 11 to the Constitution of Utah, and 3) to disregard precedence’s of any appeals court, which in this case would be The Utah Court of Appeals and The Supreme Court of the State of Utah, and the United States Supreme Court, and 4) to disregard The Object Principle of Justice. Under the doctrine of equitable maxim trial courts are the supreme law of the land.