No. 18-116

John E. Reardon v. Daniel B. Zonies, et al.

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2018-07-26
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-claim due-process fraud fraud-allegation heck-v-humphrey jurisdiction jurisdictional-challenge legal-procedure ongoing-tort standing statute-of-limitations takings
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity HabeasCorpus Securities JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2018-10-05
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does Heck v Humphrey apply to a case with ongoing constitutional violations, lack of jurisdiction, and fraud over 115 years?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Question/Issue for Review — Does Heck v Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 1994 apply to a case where (A) the Court in question lacked, lost or usurped its jurisdiction; ®) Where there is an ongoing or continuous tort or wrong that has been going on for 115 years; (C) where there is a fraud that has been going on for 115 years; (D) Where there has been a Constitutional challenge to the state’s laws seeking injunctive and declaratory relief; (E) where this is not an imprisoned or Habeas Corpus claim and (F) where the full faith and credit clause of Article 4 is not in effect for Issues (A)-(E)? i

Docket Entries

2018-10-09
Petition DENIED.
2018-09-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/5/2018.
2018-08-31
Reply of petitioner John E. Reardon filed.
2018-08-24
Brief of respondents Daniel B. Zonies, et al. in opposition filed.
2018-05-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 27, 2018)

Attorneys

Daniel B. Zonies, et al.
Matthew Blake WieliczkoZeller & Wieliczko, LL P, Respondent
John E. Reardon
John E. Reardon — Petitioner