When the lower federal courts abandon the imperatives of the Fifth Amendment to provide just compensation and the Fourteenth Amendment to provide equal protection for an eighteen year taking, by denying that it is a manifest injustice and expressing disbelief of fraud upon the court, does it set a dangerous precedent for all landowners whose land has been taken unconstitutionally by government?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED , I. WHEN THE LOWER FEDERAL COURTS ABANDON THE IMPERATIVES OF THE FIFTH AMENDMENT TO PROVIDE JUST COMPENSATION AND THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT TO PROVIDE EQUAL PROTECTION FOR AN EIGHTEEN YEAR TAKING, BY DENYING THAT IT IS A MANIFEST INJUSTICE AND EXPRESSING DISBELIEF OF FRAUD UPON THE COURT, DOESITSETADANGEROUS PRECEDENT FOR ALL LANDOWNERS WHOSE LAND HAS BEEN TAKEN UNCONSTITUTIONALLY BY GOVERNMENT? II. WHEN AN ORIGINAL SUIT FOR CONTINUING TRESPASS IS CORRUPTED BY EXTRINSIC FRAUD AND FRAUD UPON THE COURT, DOES IT LEAD TO THE CORRUPTION OF ALL FOLLOWING COMPLAINTS, WHICH DEPEND ON THE ORIGINAL MERITLESS COMPLAINT, WHICH ARE THEN DISMISSED DUE TO RESPONDENT'S CLAIMS OF RES JUDICATA? ;