No. 18-1174

Ian Goldenberg, et al. v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2019-03-11
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: eminent-domain equity judicial-taking just-compensation just-compensation-clause natural-gas-act preliminary-injunction property-rights separation-of-powers takings
Key Terms:
Takings
Latest Conference: 2019-04-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a judicially-conferred right of possession to a pipeline company before judgment and without compensation in a Natural Gas Act taking improperly invades the exclusive authority of Congress to legislate how eminent domain is exercised and violates the just compensation clause

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED The Court has long emphasized the strict construction of condemnation statutes, especially as against corporate delegatees of this sovereign power. By the plain, undisputed terms of the Natural Gas Act, 15 U.S.C. § 717f(h), a pipeline company obtains title and any incident rights of possession in property it seeks to condemn only upon entry of judgment and payment of compensation in such an action. A growing number of Circuits have nevertheless upheld grants of full possession to pipeline companies at the outset of these actions through mandatory preliminary injunctions— the Seventh Circuit has demurred. In this case, the Eleventh Circuit further expanded the reach of these injunctions in holding that a pipeline company need not even pay estimated just compensation, by posting a cash bond, before obtaining possession. As a result, Petitioners have now been deprived of their property without any compensation for over two years, even as Respondent profits from its use—pumping as much as 44.8 million cubic feet of natural gas through it every day. This case thus raises an important and frequently recurring issue never addressed by the Court as to the constitutional limits of equitable procedures in eminent domain actions at law. THE SPECIFIC QUESTION PRESENTED IS: Whether a right of possession to a pipeline company before judgment and without compensation in a Natural Gas Act taking improperly invades the exclusive authority of Congress to legislate how eminent domain is exercised and violates the just compensation clause. ii PARTIES TO THE PETITION PETITIONERS e Jan S. Goldenberg. e Handy Land and Timber L.P. e Christine Marie Cali e Gene A. Terrell e Joyce Bailey Terrell e Thomas W. Smrcina e Jeannie F. Smrcina e Donald Morris RESPONDENT e Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC

Docket Entries

2019-04-29
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/26/2019.
2019-04-04
Waiver of right of respondent Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC to respond filed.
2019-03-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 10, 2019)

Attorneys

Ian Goldenberg, et al.
John Christopher ClarkClark & Smith Law Firm, LLC, Petitioner
John Christopher ClarkClark & Smith Law Firm, LLC, Petitioner
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Nowell Donald BerrethAlston & Bird LLP, Respondent
Nowell Donald BerrethAlston & Bird LLP, Respondent