Whether the court below erroneously applied Nat'l R.R. Passenger Corp. v. Morgan when it considered each incident of harassment as a single, discrete incident instead of an ongoing pattern of conduct establishing a hostile work environment in direct contradiction to this Court's ruling in Morgan

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the court below erroneously applied Nat7 R.R. Passenger Corp. v. Morgan when _ it considered each incident of harassment as a single, discrete incident instead of an ongoing pattern of conduct establishing a hostile work environment in direct contradiction to this Court’s ruling in Morgan. 2. Whether the court below erroneously held that Haynie’s claims for retaliation, retaliatory hostile work environment, and constructive discharge pursuant to United’s Motion to Dismiss, despite the fact that they were filed timely. 3. Whether the District Court erred in granting United’s motion for summary judgment despite the existence of disputed issues of material fact and uncontroverted evidence that the Petitioner complained of the hostile environment and the Respondent failed to investigate.