No. 18-1208

William M. Turner v. Middle Rio Grande Conservancy District, et al.

Lower Court: Tenth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-03-18
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights continuing-wrong continuing-wrong-doctrine due-process heck-v-humphrey malicious-prosecution section-1983 statute-of-limitations tenth-circuit younger-abstention
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess FirstAmendment CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference: 2019-05-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Tenth Circuit erred in finding that Appellant's 1983 and 1985 claims are barred by the Statute of Limitations

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether the Tenth Circuit erred in finding that Appellant’s 1983 and 1985 claims are barred by the Statute of Limitations. Whether the Tenth Circuit erred in failing to apply the principle underlying in Heck v. Humphrey in this case. Whether the Tenth Circuit erred in finding that the Statute of Limitation (SOL) of Appellant’s malicious prosecution claim accrued on February 26, 2010 on which the New Mexico Board of Licensure for Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors (BOL) entered a decision against the Appellant. Whether the Tenth Circuit erred in finding that Appellant’s federal claims could have been dismissed under Younger Abstention. Whether the Tenth Circuit erred in finding that the “continuing wrong doctrine” is inapplicable to Appellant’s federal claims.

Docket Entries

2019-05-20
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/16/2019.
2019-03-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 17, 2019)

Attorneys

William M. Turner
Aubrey Blair DunnWestern Agriculture, Resource and Business Advocates, LLP, Petitioner
Aubrey Blair DunnWestern Agriculture, Resource and Business Advocates, LLP, Petitioner