No. 18-122

Michael Sinegal v. Dawn Polk

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2018-07-27
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response RequestedRelisted (2)
Tags: 1st-amendment circuit-split civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process employment-law employment-retaliation first-amendment free-speech political-candidacy qualified-immunity standing
Key Terms:
FirstAmendment
Latest Conference: 2019-01-04 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether candidacy for political office, standing alone, is a protected right under the First Amendment

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED County Commissioner Michael Sinegal terminated Dawn Polk for being a bad employee. The termination occurred after she had unsuccessfully run for office for the position of Precinct 8, Justice of the Peace. Polk sued Commissioner Sinegal for terminating her in violation of her First Amendment right to run for office. The trial court and the Fifth Circuit denied Sinegal qualified immunity holding, in opposition to other federal circuits, that candidacy alone is protected by the First Amendment. The questions presented are: 1. Whether candidacy for political office, standing alone, is a protected right under the First Amendment. 2. Did the Fifth Circuit err in holding that Sinegal was not entitled to qualified immunity when Fifth Circuit precedent did not clearly establish that candidacy alone was a protected First Amendment right until a year after Polk’s termination?

Docket Entries

2019-01-07
Petition DENIED.
2018-11-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.
2018-11-28
Reply of petitioner Michael Sinegal filed. (Distributed)
2018-11-14
Brief of respondent Dawn Polk in opposition filed.
2018-10-03
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 14, 2018.
2018-09-29
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 15, 2018 to November 14, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
2018-09-14
Response Requested. (Due October 15, 2018)
2018-09-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/5/2018.
2018-07-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 27, 2018)

Attorneys

Dawn Polk
Laurence W. Watts — Respondent
Laurence W. Watts — Respondent
Michael Sinegal
Kathleen Marie KennedyJefferson County District Attorney's Office, Petitioner
Kathleen Marie KennedyJefferson County District Attorney's Office, Petitioner