No. 18-1227

Alvin S. Kanofsky v. Pennsylvania

Lower Court: Pennsylvania
Docketed: 2019-03-20
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: abuse-of-process civil-procedure civil-rights conservatorship due-process free-speech government-corruption judicial-bias judicial-misconduct municipal-fraud municipal-liability property-rights standing takings
Key Terms:
Securities
Latest Conference: 2019-05-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the City of Bethlehem improperly seized Kanofsky's property through abuse of process and collusion with the courts

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS ASKED 1. Was Kanofsky Responsible for Building Damage? NO 2. Is City of Bethlehem responsible for Damage to Building as Charged by Judge Leonard Zito? YES 3. Did City Purposely Cite and harass Petitioner to get Building? YES * 4. Did Court delay access to transcripts of trials? YES 5. Did Kanofsky have permission from City to Occupy Building? YES 6. Did Kanofsky utilize building for ten years with flea market ? YES : 7. Did neighbor Saraceno make false libelous slanderous statements? YES 8. Did City force entry into building several times? YES _ 9. Did Judges collude with City to seize building from Petitioner? YES 10. Did Judge BROBSON make false statements in the Kanofsky appeals? YES 11.Is Judge Beltrami biased against Petitioner and has conflicts of interest? YES 12. Did witnesses for City at trial make false scandalous testimony? YES 13. Did the judges purposely schedule the trials at conflicting times to prevent Kanofsky attending? YES : 14.Was Kanofsky subjected to pressure from City over Decades to give up building? YES 15. Were all of the conditions of the Conservatorship satisfied? NO 16. Are some of the conditions still in litigation? YES 17..Did the President Judge LEAVITT of Commonwealth Court rule the lot is not blighted? YES 18.Is the United States a co-defendant along with Kanofsky in the case? YES ; 19. Was the adjacent lot blighted and satisfying the Conservatorship requirements? NO : 20.Is the property worth substantially more now with the recent completion that the giant office building and parking lot 200 feet from Kanofsky’s properties? YES 21.Has Judge BROBSON consistently ruled against Kanofsky over many years including earlier in 2012 with The City of Philadelphia breaking into Kanofsky’s property in Philadelphia? YES 22. Is further litigation moot regarding Conservatorship proceedings until the this initial case is affirmed by the courts? YES ; . 23.Is it correct to have United States as a co-appellant with the Commonwealth as seemingly arranged by Judge BROBSON? NO 24. Was the Northampton County Court correct in finally overturning Judge Beltrami’s guilty verdict, jail sentence, and $625 K restitution order on the thirteen year old boy for his wrongful conviction of setting fire to a house, .with this case being cited nationally by the Michigan University Innocence Project as one of the country’s major travesties of Justice. YES 25. Did City of Bethlehem attempt to Delay and cover up the court hearing on N H ' the Front Broken Window case heard by Judge Samuel Murray for fear of it revealing incriminating actions on their part. Specifically, the city front loader hitting the side wall by the window while dumping snow on Petitioner’s lot after the January 22, 2016 record 32 inch snow storm, causing the breakage of the front wind, side wall stucco damage, androofdamage, . and thus exonerating Kanofsky? YES _ 26. Did Judge Zito acknowledge Kanofsky’s claims that the City is responsible for damage? NO 27. Does the Allentown Trial of the United States vs. the Mayor Pawlowski for } fraud and corruption support Kanofsky’s claims of fraud and corruption by | the local entities? YES , 28.Did City block bids for building conservator Entities from outside parties, . e.g. Rich Morales — Leonare Mohr Group? YES .

Docket Entries

2019-05-20
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/16/2019.
2019-04-17
Waiver of right of respondent The City of Bethlehem to respond filed.
2018-08-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 19, 2019)

Attorneys

Alvin Kanofsky
Alvin Kanofsky — Petitioner
The City of Bethlehem
Matthew J. DeschlerCity of Bethlehem Law Bureau, Respondent