Veeramuthu P. Gounder v. Argante R. Grippa, et al.
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Can a driver suddenly stop on a highway without warning?
QUESTIONS PRESENTED , 1. Cana driver of a motor vehicle on a major highway at a speed of 50 mph, in the extreme fast lane with , traffic, suddenly come to an immediate stop without any warning or signal that he is going to stop? 2. Can a driver of a motor vehicle involved in an accident, leave the scene of an accident before the police, and the ambulance arrive? 3. Was the police report of the accident a correct re: port? 4. Can a state trooper ignore the fact that the accident did not happen at the location where the damaged ; vehicles were standing, and when told that it was at : another location, make a wrong entry of the location, and not seeing any debris from the accident at this location make an incorrect entry? 5. Can an experienced driver of a Taxi with 40 years’ experience, willfully crash into the rear of another vehicle, if the rules of the New York State motor vehicles was followed? 6. At the EBT, there was one lawyer, who conducted the EBT. At the trial another lawyer appeared, and had no transcript of the EBT. According to the law, only ev; idence that has been recorded at the EBT is permitted TO BE INTRODUCED AT the trial. Can it be legal and fair, if the Judge ignored the fact that new evidence changed, and completely warped the facts of the case? : ii QUESTIONS PRESENTED -— Continued : Can new evidence be introduced when an EBT has been recorded, and nothing else can be added? 7. At the trial, can the Judge ignore the fact that the police report was wrong, and even when the defendant had admitted that he left the scene of an accident before the police arrived? 8. The accident caused injury to the appellant, and was compounded by a heart attack, and medical records to prove the injuries. Why did the Judge choose to : ignore the fact that an indiscriminate sudden stop on a highway, in a fast lane caused an accident because of infractions of the directive and rules of the road according to the Motor vehicles act of New York? . 9. Why did the Judge choose to ignore the records of the Time and work and business losses because of the sudden stop? 10. Why was there a racial discrimination against the plaintiff, shown, because he was not White Cauca: sian, but an ethnic minority, Asian Indian, as the driver who stopped suddenly was white, the Police trooper who gave an incorrect accident report was white, and the Judge and the lawyer for the defendant were both white? 11. Why was there no reasoning for the dismissal, by the Judge, who just gave a brief “Dismissed” Judgement without any explanation for the judgement? iii QUESTIONS PRESENTED Continued . 12. On appeal, the judge ruled that it was incumbent on the driver of the stopped vehicle to explain the reason for the sudden stop, and the operator of the 2nd vehicle explained that it is overt negligence on the part of the driver who stopped suddenly, but why was his ; testimony not accepted by the judge, who was also white, as it is also highly improbable that an experienced driver in the Taxi and Limousine business for 40 years would wantonly crash into the rear of a vehicle that slowed down and stopped, as the lawyer for the , defendant claimed. The brake lights of the vehicle that , stopped was inoperative, and why did the state trooper who wrote the accident report not check if the brake lights were operational, in spite of the Plaintiff telling the trooper that there were no indications of a stop? 13. When plaintiff appealed to Supreme court of the Appellate term, the decision Dec 7, 2017, was again given by the same judge who gave the earlier decision. Why was the same judge making a decision and dismissing on a case that he made an earlier decision? Is this an ethics violation, and a conflict of interests, for the same judge to make a decision on a case that he made a decision on earlier? 14. Why, when Plaintiff appealed to the Supreme court of the state of New York, appellate division, within the correct time limits, was his appeal dismissed without any re