No. 18-1252
Rev. Barry D. Bilder v. Rev. Beth Mathers, et al.
Tags: civil-rights dna dna-collection due-process fourth-amendment fourth-amendment-rights reasonableness right-to-counsel search-warrant seizure sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity FourthAmendment DueProcess CriminalProcedure
SocialSecurity FourthAmendment DueProcess CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference:
2019-05-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is a Search Warrant (for DNA) reasonable under the Fourth (4th) Amendment?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1) Isa Search Warrant (for DNA) “reasonable” under ; the Fourth (4th) Amendment? 2) Was the Petitioner’s Sixth (6th) Amendment, “Right to Counsel,” violated when Petitioner was denied counsel while he was detained, served with a Search Warrant (for DNA), and had his DNA seized? 3) Is the Fourteenth (14th) Amendment, “Due Process” clause, violated under 42 U.S.C. §14132(d), “Expungement of Records”, a statute which provides for an Arrestee to expunge his DNA records, ‘but does not provide for a Non-Arrestee to expunge his DNA record?
Docket Entries
2019-06-03
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/30/2019.
2019-04-29
Brief of respondent City of Tulsa in opposition filed.
2019-04-29
Brief of respondents Rev. Beth Mathers, Ruth Bilder in opposition filed.
2019-03-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 29, 2019)
Attorneys
City of Tulsa
Gerald Matthew Bender — City of Tulsa Legal Department, Respondent
Gerald Matthew Bender — City of Tulsa Legal Department, Respondent
Rev. Beth Mathers, Ruth Bilder
Bill V. Wilkinson — Wilkinson Law Firm, Respondent
Bill V. Wilkinson — Wilkinson Law Firm, Respondent