Whether the Supreme Court should punish Switzerland for an alleged chemical weapon attack on a U.S. citizen by enforcing a lien on Swiss assets, despite the lack of a contested legal proceeding

QUESTION PRESENTED The primary federal question that I ask is: . Since the inception of the United States Supreme Court led by Chief Justice John Jay, there has never been a Writ of Certiorari where the respondent fails to appoint counsel and the defendant’s peaceful legal proceedings goes uncontested, unanswered and unchallenged by ignoring the seven prior attempts to contact their worldwide embassies and their extradition office, : , isn’t this an admission of Switzerland’s guilt in the hei, nous and despicable international act of a chemical weapon attack on a citizen of the USA (18 U.S.C. § 229 ; Section C3), where there are no previous cases and shouldn’t the United States Supreme Court punish this unacceptable act of international terrorism by enforcing the paltry lien of US$440 million (tax-free) for . the plaintiff-victim and US$330 million for American Federal Taxes on Swiss Assets here in the United States?