Whether district court erred in dismissing claims and transferring venue in violation of rules and procedures

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW . ; When a district court has erred and it’s brought to their attention in contrast of that information a case continues to progress forward without correction in violation of its own local rules , & Fed. Rules Civ. Procedure a series of events begins to erode at the claims process, damaging the totality of a claim for all who seek corrective action. That ; damage leads the district court to remove a party from the claim that should justly be held accountable. When a district court finalizes its decision under Title VII to change the venue to : another state where the Petitioner lacks the ability and resources when other venue options are within the district courts, defendant’s & claimant’s ability the rights of the claimant become infringed upon. . The Appellate Court for the district that made the . venue change becomes crucial through the Writ of Mandamus petition process. When the Court of Appeals also denies motions by the Petitioner for status conference its an issue of a violation under the Constitution. 1. Whether this Court should use its authority to by ensuring that all rules and regulations are ; followed and reverse the district court order ; and correct any and all errors to include a location the Petitioner can travel to? . 2. Whether any of the Due Process Rights of the Petitioner were violated when the U.S. Court . : of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit dismissed the Petitioners Claim and denied . Status Conference Motion without hearing all : the Petitioners grievances.