No. 18-1270
Henry M. Jagos, et ux. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Response Waived
Tags: administrative-law administrative-procedure circuit-court-split circuit-split civil-procedure due-process eighth-circuit judicial-review jurisdiction notice-of-deficiency sixth-circuit standing tax-appeals tax-court tax-court-jurisdiction tax-procedure
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw
AdministrativeLaw
Latest Conference:
2019-05-09
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Tax Court lack jurisdiction when it had no facially legitimate notice of deficiency?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTIONS FOR REVIEW = Rs : : oL. Did the Tax Court lack jurisdiction when it a : -had no facially legitimate notice of deficiency? : ‘ . _ 2. Did'the Sixth Circuit Coutt Of Appeals’ a i properly consider all-of Petitioners arguments — ; oe a “andthe law? °/ ce , Be oo, 3. Why did the Sixth Circuit Court Of Appeals . Soe, eS -. come to a different ruling than the Eighth ce = Pe * oo Circuit Court Of Appeals on the same issue? . . ‘ oo ; a . = Do “y :
Docket Entries
2019-05-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2019.
2019-04-08
Waiver of right of respondent Commissioner of Internal Revenue to respond filed.
2019-01-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 3, 2019)
Attorneys
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent