No. 18-131
Troy Lyndon v. Securities and Exchange Commission
Response Waived
Tags: agency-action agency-authority agency-enforcement civil-enforcement civil-procedure civil-rights discovery due-process evidence-withholding exculpatory-evidence judicial-discretion settlement-agreement
Key Terms:
DueProcess Securities Privacy
DueProcess Securities Privacy
Latest Conference:
2018-09-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the District Court err in allowing an agency of the United States to contest and withhold exculpatory evidence when prosecuting a civil enforcement case against an individual?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Did the District Court err in allowing an agency of the United States to contest and withhold exculpatory evidence when prosecuting a civil enforcement case against an individual? Did the District Court err in allowing an agency of the United States to contest and withhold evidence it had obligated itself to provide in the parties’ settlement agreement? .
Docket Entries
2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-08-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-08-07
Waiver of right of respondent Securities and Exchange Commission to respond filed.
2018-06-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 30, 2018)
Attorneys
Securities and Exchange Commission
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent