Should the order of the court of appeals denying a certificate of appealability be reversed and remanded, because it is manifestly incorrect to suggest that no reasonable jurist could disagree with a district court order summarily denying a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, where that order directly conflicts with the controlling decisions of this Court and the plain language of § 2255?

QUESTION PRESENTED Should the order of the court of appeals denying a certificate of appealability be reversed and remanded, because it is manifestly incorrect to suggest that no reasonable jurist could disagree with a district court order summarily denying a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, where that order directly conflicts with the controlling decisions of this Court and the plain language of § 2255? i LIST OF ALL PARTIES The caption of the case in this Court contains the names of all parties (petitioner Vogt and respondent United States). There were no co-defendants or coappellants. ii