When multiple police officers seek qualified immunity on a summary judgment motion, their entitlement to qualified immunity should be evaluated individually, not collectively

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. When multiple police officers seek qualified immunity on a summary judgment motion, should their entitlement to qualified immunity be evaluated individually or collectively? 2. Did the court below act contrary to this Court’s precedents by relying on a_ single inapposite precedent—its own—in determining that it was clearly established that business owners have a right to be free from retaliation directed toward their business by police officers after the owner complained to those police officers regarding their conduct?