No. 18-1333

Ronald Jones, et al. v. Michael Keitz, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-04-23
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: 42-usc-1983 ashcroft-v-iqbal civil-rights county-liability heightened-pleading iqbal-standard malicious-prosecution monell-claim municipal-liability pleading-standard section-1983 sheriff-liability
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2019-06-13
Question Presented (AI Summary)

What facts must a plaintiff allege to state a claim for malicious prosecution against a California county and its sheriff under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, especially considering the heightened pleading standard this Court established in Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009)?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. What facts must a plaintiff allege to state a claim for malicious prosecution against a California county and its sheriff under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, especially considering the heightened pleading standard this Court established in Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009)? 2. When a county sheriffis the country’s chief law enforcement officer, can a plaintiff hold a California County liable under Monell v. New York City Department of Social Services, 436 U.S. 658, 694 (1978), by pleading he was wrongfully prosecuted based on an investigation led by the sheriff?

Docket Entries

2019-06-17
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/13/2019.
2019-05-20
Waiver of right of respondents Michael Keitz, et al. to respond filed.
2019-04-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 23, 2019)

Attorneys

Michael Keitz, et al.
Todd William BaxterMcCormick Barstow etal, Respondent
Todd William BaxterMcCormick Barstow etal, Respondent
Ronald Jones, et al.
David Glenn BakerLaw Office of David Glenn Baker, Petitioner
David Glenn BakerLaw Office of David Glenn Baker, Petitioner