Whether the motion to re-open was justified due to crimes (e.g. fraud) and judicial accessories-after-the-fact

QUESTIONS PRESENTED The motion to re-open was because of crimes (e.g. fraud) and judicial Crimes are being committed not only by listed creditors, a and a discharged debtor; but also by judges, justices and federal officers who conceal the crimes and thus become (since all are felonies). 18 USC Secs. 152 and 157; Cal. Penal Code Secs. 17, 31 and 33. The felonies and the concealment have been occurring for years. There is no immunity for: (1) judges and justices who act as prosecutors of Kinney rather than act as neutral arbitrators of disputes [e.g. they not only concealed the fraud, but also knew there was the clear absence of all jurisdiction to issue any fee awards]; (2) listed, unsecured creditors Marcus, discharged debtor Clark, and contract. attorney Chomsky; and (3) officers who refuse to enforce bankruptcy laws even though stopping this type of fraud is one of their specific duties. Michele R. Clark is the 2010 Chapter 7 no asset discharged debtor. Her attorneys David Marcus etc were listed creditors [who had Clark sign a 2007 hourly-fee retainer with a charging lien]. The contract-attorney is Eric Chomsky. Kinney and Kempton were co-buyers of Clark’s house in 2005, but creditors Marcus etc kept violating 11 USC Sec. 524(a)(2) by moving for more attorney fees. The courts and others continue to conceal ongoing fraud and ignore 11 USC Sec. 524(a)(1). i