Whether a U.S. Customs and Border Protection agent is entitled to qualified immunity for allegedly coercing a mother into departing the U.S., where she was soon thereafter killed

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Did the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit improperly weigh evidence and fail to draw factual inferences in favor of the nonmoving party when it determined that a U.S. Customs and Border Protection agent was entitled to qualified immunity in a suit brought by surviving minor children who allege that the agent intentionally coerced their mother into departing the United States for Mexico, where she was soon thereafter killed by a vio‘lent former partner? 2. Did the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit err when it declined to extend an implied right of action under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971) | (“Bivens”) to children who alleged that their | mother was coerced into relinquishing her right to apply for protection against removal under the | Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”)?