No. 18-1355
Edward Kramer v. Antonio Vitti, et al.
Tags: 42-usc-1983 4th-amendment appellate-review civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights factual-dispute jury-trial malicious-prosecution material-dispute material-facts seventh-amendment summary-judgment
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity
SocialSecurity
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Petitioner's Seventh Amendment right to a jury determination of the material disputed facts in his case was violated when the Court of Appeals granted the Respondents' motion for summary judgment despite the existence of a material factual dispute
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Petitioner's Seventh Amendment right to a jury determination of the material disputed facts in his case was violated when the Court of Appeals granted the Respondents’ motion for summary judgment despite the existence of a material factual dispute.
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-05-24
Brief of respondents Antonio Vitti, et al. in opposition filed.
2019-04-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 29, 2019)
Attorneys
Antonio Vitti, et al.
James N. Tallberg — Karsten and Tallberg, LLC, Respondent
James N. Tallberg — Karsten and Tallberg, LLC, Respondent
Edward Kramer
John Roger Williams — John R. Williams and Associates, LLC, Petitioner
John Roger Williams — John R. Williams and Associates, LLC, Petitioner