Whether the issuance of a court order from an ex-parte probate hearing, granting the petitioning party the power to enter someone else's private home and remove their private property and valuables without prior notice to or consent from the resident of that home, violates the due process clause of the Fifth or Fourteenth Amendment to the United States (U.S.) Constitution

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the issuance of a court order from an ex-parte probate hearing, granting the petitioning party the power to enter someone else’s private home : and remove their private property and valuables without prior notice to or consent from the resident of that home, violates the due process clause of the Fifth or Fourteenth Amendment to the United States (U.S.) Constitution. 2. Whether the issuance of a court order from an ex-parte probate hearing, granting the petitioning : party the power to enter someone else’s home and remove their private property and valuables without prior notice to or consent from the resident of that : home, violates the unreasonable search and seizure clause of the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. . . . ; . 3. Whether the removal of someone else’s private oO property and valuables, without probable cause, prior notice to, or consent from the resident of that home, violates the freedom of religion clause found in the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. . ; 4. Whether any state statute, code, rule, policy, procedure, practice, legislation, “law”, judgment or court order, etc., which violates an Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, is void, ab initio, pursuant to the : Supremacy Clause found in Article 6, Clause 2 of the : US. Constitution. ii PARTIES TO THE PETITION Petitioner ; e Catherine Rose Dreyer Respondents — Real Parties in Interest e Christie L. Wislicenus e Billy D. Bledsoe, Judge, Constitutional County | Court, Coleman County, Texas