Whether a veteran has a right to meaningful access to the courts and administrative agencies under the First Amendment when the government concealed evidence, engaged in a pattern of fabrication and obstruction of justice

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether a veteran has a right to meaningful . access to the courts and administrative agencies : under the First Amendment of the Constitution when : the government concealed evidence during adjudication, engaged in a continuing of pattern of systematic, deliberate fabrication of false statements and obstruction of justice, including, but not limited to, creating a false and fraudulent Board of Veterans Affairs (BVA). Decision based on fraudulently concealing material ; / evidence this veteran had submitted timely appeal as ; uncovered by his FOIA request and terminating this veteran’s appeal thereby completely foreclosing any _further remedy, then published on petitioners official Veterans Affairs website for veterans (VA.gov). 2. Whether it is a violation of this veteran’s First and Fifth Amendment rights when the VA and the . . District Court use the presumption of regularity and, : or 38 U.S.C. § 511(a) non-review preclusion clause to ; ignore rebuttal evidence to defendants motion to . dismiss (MTD), and to plaintiffs Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (FRCP) 12(b)1 OMTD and 60(b)3. : 3. Whether a veteran has a constitutional right ; to a fair hearing on the merits of his disability claim ; ; ’ decided according to fundamentally fair procedures ; and that the initial and subsequent determinations has been subject to nothing but deferential review that continues with the same concealed evidence during adjudication, misstatements of material facts, misstate: ments of law, fraudulent submissions and omissions.