No. 18-137

Ernest Hunter v. District of Columbia

Lower Court: District of Columbia
Docketed: 2018-07-31
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: administrative-law administrative-procedure civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-challenge constitutional-law dc-government due-process employment-dispute employment-rights free-speech government-agency government-employment personnel-rules retaliation whistleblower whistleblower-act whistleblower-protection
Key Terms:
Immigration
Latest Conference: 2018-09-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the application of the District of Columbia's personnel rules, including the Abolishment and DC Whistleblower Acts, by the District's Office of Employee Appeals and courts is unconstitutional

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION PRESENTED Is the application of the relevant personnel rules of the District of Columbia, including the Abolishment and D.C. Whistleblowers Acts (DCWPA) by the District’s Office of Employee of Appeals (OEA) and the District of Columbia’s District Court and Circuit Court of Appeals, unconstitutional? ; ii PARTIES TO THE PETITION PETITIONER e Ernest Hunter, an individual : RESPONDENTS e District of Columbia Government e District of Columbia, Child and Family Services Agency ; ili :

Docket Entries

2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-08-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-08-09
Waiver of right of respondent District of Columbia to respond filed.
2018-07-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 30, 2018)

Attorneys

District of Columbia
Stacy Louise AndersonOffice of the Attorney General for the District of Columbia, Respondent
Stacy Louise AndersonOffice of the Attorney General for the District of Columbia, Respondent
Ernest Hunter
Ernest Hunter — Petitioner
Ernest Hunter — Petitioner