Whether federal district and appellate courts may render decisions abridging First Amendment rights based on overwhelming fraud in the record, while abusing discretion by relying on errors of law and clearly erroneous factual findings that deny due process and a jury trial

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. A National precedent setting question is asked, may Federal District & Appellate Courts render a Decision abridging First Amendment Rights to . Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Religion and exercise thereof based on overwhelming fraud in the record as its foundation. While at the same time abusing its discretion when a decision rests on an error of law using clearly erroneous factual findings with a decision that cannot be located within the range of permissible decisions denying due process and a jury trial (Zervos v. Verizon N.Y. , 252 F.3d 163, 168-69 (2d Cir. 2001); accord SEC v. Lynn A. Smith, 11-3843-cv (L) (2d Cir. 2013)? : 2. Is it within jurisdiction of District/Appellate courts to abandon the rule of law by unlawfully setting aside findings of fact and denying Petitioner’s rights to challenge/question credibility of known perjured witnesses, while never being afforded the opportunity to be heard in a trial court with manufactured false facts and tampering with : evidence by the Court itself compromising the sanctity of the Judicial mechanism. Bulloch uv. United States, 763 F.2d 1115 (10th Cir. 1985) citing Wilkin v. Sunbeam Corp., 466 F.2d 714 (10th Cir. 1972). . We hold this question affects Constitutional Rights (1st, 4th, 5th, 7th, 8th, & 14th Amendments) of all Americans under the Rule of Law having a direct impact on Public Policy in this and similar cases posing an enormous threat by denying an American citizen : their 1st, 5th, 7th, & 14th Amendment rights to due 1 WQvsOHA 4 1 aay WEP ee ii QUESTIONS PRESENTED — Continued process and a jury trial while punishing American citizens for exercising their unalienable Rights to Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Religion and exercise thereof for a proper defense in accordance with the Rule of Law. iii _