Parental rights and due process violations in international child custody dispute

QUESTIONS PRESENTED ; This is a parental rights case where international private law and constitutional law intersect with ramifications of exceptional relevance for US legal policy worldwide and the functioning of the domestic legal system. Specifically, this case addresses a pro se father’s rights and the need to protect US jurisdiction and laws as well as to enforce final US judgments internationally —in tandem with foreign exequatur proceedings under Continental Law-, all in light of his rights to due process and to be timely heard in the context of his unequal treatment under the law. 1. Did the lower court infringe the Petitioner’s parental rights and due process by ignoring the Court’s unanimous precedent, in re, Chafin v. Chafin, as a result of the Respondent attacking the final US divorce judgment and orders via a subsequent . fraudulent and concealed contentious divorce action in Spain, among other relief related to minor children? 2. Did the lower court infringe the Petitioner’s parental and property rights by perpetuating a status quo of contempt to court and fraud by the Respondent, thus granting the latter a de facto sole custody award while terminating this party's parental rights, all through due process violations and an unequal treatment under the law (never proper proceedings per local normative)? Af il QUESTIONS PRESENTED Continued 3. Did the lower court infringe the Petitioner's parental and property rights by applying the law in a biased, partial and unequal fashion? In this regard, did the lower court also infringe the Petitioner’s due process by not disqualifying the district court judge, reversing her rulings, and ordering the transfer of : any further proceedings to federal venue? 4. Did the lower court ignore the constitutional claims posed by the Petitioner as well as all records, facts, and applicable law in this case, including undisputed evidence proving abuse of process, false criminal charges and illegitimate advancement of civil claims, a spurious civil restraining order with nationwide reach under federal punishment, the curtailment of this party's parental and property rights, unethical and criminal conduct, as well as lack of proper counsel, police brutality, harassment, and persecution through state-related institutions?