No. 18-1397

Prism Technologies LLC v. Sprint Spectrum L.P., dba Sprint PCS

Lower Court: Federal Circuit
Docketed: 2019-05-06
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: 35-usc-101 appellate-jurisdiction collateral-estoppel federal-circuit federal-circuit-jurisdiction jurisdiction-scope mandate-rule patent-claims patent-eligibility patent-invalidity retroactive-expansion
Key Terms:
Patent JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2019-06-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals may retroactively expand the scope of its appellate jurisdiction to invalidate patent claims under 35 U.S.C. § 101 when those claims were not raised in the petitioner's appeal or necessary for its judgment

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals may retroactively expand the scope of its appellate jurisdiction to invalidate patent claims under 35 U.S.C. § 101 when those claims were not raised in the petitioner’s appeal or necessary for its judgment? Whether a district court may disregard a mandate from the Federal Circuit for entry of judgment, and ignore this Court’s precedent, by retroactively applying the collateral estoppel doctrine based on a ruling in a subsequent action where there is no mutuality of claims or defenses?

Docket Entries

2019-06-10
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/6/2019.
2019-05-16
Waiver of right of respondent Sprint Spectrum L.P., dba Sprint PCS to respond filed.
2019-05-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 5, 2019)

Attorneys

Prism Technologies LLC
Paul Joseph AndreKramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel, Petitioner
Paul Joseph AndreKramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel, Petitioner
Sprint Spectrum L.P., dba Sprint PCS
Carter G. PhillipsSidley Austin LLP, Respondent
Carter G. PhillipsSidley Austin LLP, Respondent