Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in failing to vacate the erroneous denial of Mr. Larry Klayman's admission pro hac vice despite the fact that it is now moot, yet still causing Mr. Klayman grave and serious injury

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Did the Ninth Circuit err in failing to vacate the erroneous denial of Mr. Larry Klayman’s (“Mr. Klayman”) admission pro hac vice in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada despite the fact that it is now moot, yet still causing Mr. Klayman grave and serious injury?