No. 18-1408
Response Waived
Tags: complete-defense constitutional-rights criminal-behavior criminal-charge criminal-procedure due-process evidence-presentation fourth-amendment innocent-behavior probable-cause reasonable-suspicion right-to-defense terry-stop
Key Terms:
DueProcess FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure
DueProcess FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference:
2019-06-20
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Defendant/Petitioner John Washek's Fourth Amendment rights were violated because the police officer's Terry stop was based on observations much more consistent with innocent than criminal behavior
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether John Washek’s Fourth Amendment rights were violated because the police officer’s Terry stop was based on observations much more consistent with innocent than criminal behavior. 2. Whether the trial court denied Defendant/ Petitioner John Washek’s constitutional right to present a complete defense to the criminal charge brought against him when he was barred from showing the jury the remaining portion of his processing video not shown by the State.
Docket Entries
2019-06-24
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/20/2019.
2019-05-22
Waiver of right of respondent Vermont to respond filed.
2019-03-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 10, 2019)
Attorneys
JOHN WASHEK
Peter Forbes Langrock — Langrock Sperry & Wool, LLP, Petitioner
Vermont
Benjamin Daniel Battles — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent