No. 18-1414

Giuliano Stefano Giovanni Wildhaber v. EFV, et al.

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2019-05-10
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: aliens-tort-claim-act aliens-tort-claims-act constitutional-rights due-process equitable-tolling jurisdiction property-rights sovereign-immunity statute-of-limitation
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the ATS/ATCA allows liability under a 100% valid kept foreign (Switzerland) statute of limitation

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

question for review. d. Wildhaber has hundred percent proofs, that the Swiss twenty year time limitation were interrupted by two Swiss court actions and this even vice-versa. Also by the defendants v. Wildhaber on 05/27/2016 1.06 Mio. This is a fact-specific determination ; because a finding “extraordinary circumstances [necessary for equitable tolling] is reserved for extraordinary facts.” e. In addition, the defendants EFV & EBK-Finma Switzerland missed the deadlines (1 + 2 days) for their motions and recured in the wrong court not like ii in the sealed SUMMONS written. Then all this now granted dismissal requests should be zero and void. f. That comes to that the 100% proven fact in my case is that the Defendants are hundred percent guilty. This without any doubt. All evidences and proofs Wildhaber has already brought in the suit in advance and are all the time available. I have even all the video evidences and legal opinions and court files online (see the two missed deadlines under download EFV & EBK pdf) for a long time and are available at: g. Wildhaber owes to the USB Bank Switzerland AG until today still CHF 1.06 million in full (05/17/2016 actio). He was a victim of this criminal conspiracy from the October 10, 1989 decree. That was the « casus belli ». Wildhaber heard in 2015 the first time about ATS. Then I reacted (2016) and decided to sue. h. The Decree over night from October 10, 1989 (new a Yes) was the biggest Swiss Constitutional Fraud ever. Swiss citizens' rights are defined as those rights that enable the citizens to decide on , political issues (final-votes). The Swiss direct democracy is worldwide unique. i. They are part of the political rights and form the core of direct democracy. The national constitution provides that the people have the opportunity to make proposals for the revision of constitutional and ; legal provisions by a "Volksinitiative". The CH-BV iii Federal Constitution requires that the decisions taken by the people by voting must be implemented by law within a period of five years and certainly not 100% the contrary (1989) of this voting result (12/04/1988). ; k. According to Article 17 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 1948, the right to property is a human right. In Switzerland, there is a property guarantee listed in the Federal Constitution Chapter 1, Fundamental Rights, under Article 26. 1. The property is guaranteed. 2. Expropriations and property restrictions, which are equivalent to Expropriations are fully compensated. Unfortunately, this is just a Swiss-theory until today. :

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-02-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 10, 2019)

Attorneys

Giuliano Wildhaber
Guiliano Wildhaber — Petitioner
Guiliano Wildhaber — Petitioner