No. 18-1416
Adam Bereki v. Gary Humphreys, et ux.
Response Waived
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-law due-process excessive-fines penal-forfeiture restitution standing statutory-interpretation takings unjust-enrichment
Key Terms:
Arbitration ERISA DueProcess Securities JusticiabilityDoctri
Arbitration ERISA DueProcess Securities JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Are sections §7031(a) and (b) of the California Business and Professions Code unconstitutional in effect or as applied?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Are sections §7031(a) and (b), of the California Business and Professions Code unconstitutional in effect or as applied? 2. Is disgorgement under the laws of restitution and unjust enrichment a penal forfeiture? What Constitutional safeguards apply?
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-05-21
Waiver of right of respondent Gary Humphres, et ux. to respond filed.
2019-04-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 12, 2019)
Attorneys
Adam Bereki
James Glenn Bohm — Bohm Wildish, LLP, Petitioner
James Glenn Bohm — Bohm Wildish, LLP, Petitioner
Gary Humphres, et ux.
William Bissell — Law Office of William G. Bissell, Respondent
William Bissell — Law Office of William G. Bissell, Respondent