Marby Hogen, et al. v. Steven C. Hogen, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Arline H. Hogen, Deceased, et al.
DueProcess Takings Privacy
Does the decision of the Supreme Court of North Dakota deprive the Petitioners of established property rights in violation of the due process and equal protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States?
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Does the decision of the Supreme Court of North Dakota deprive the Petitioners of established property rights in violation of the due process and equal protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States? 2. Has the State of North Dakota, acting through its judiciary, deprived the Petitioners of their vested property rights without any real opportunity to protect such rights in violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment? 3. Were Petitioners denied vested property interests, in violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, when the State of North Dakota’s judiciary determined the Petitioners’ property interests could be extinguished by either a court appointed personal representative or court appointed trustee although Petitioners were never provided notice, nor made parties to either the probate proceedings or trust litigation that occurred after their property interests were created? ii LIST OF ALL