No. 18-1464
Milos Jiricko v. Frankenburg Jensen Law Firm, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights constitution constitutional-interpretation constitutional-law constitutional-oath due-process judicial-review legislative-statute medical-malpractice standing supreme-court-review takings
Key Terms:
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2019-06-20
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the US Supreme Court can apply a blind eye to the alleged unconstitutionality of the Utah State Medical Malpractice statute, Code 78B-3-401
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED: 1. Whether the US Supreme Court can apply a blind eye to the alleged unconstitutionality of the Utah State Medical Malpractice statute, Code 78B-3-401, while the Chief Justice John Marshall declared that it is the Supreme Court's responsibility to overturn unconstitutional legislation as necessary consequence of the sworn to oath of office to uphold the Constitution mandated the US Const. Article VI.
Docket Entries
2019-06-24
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/20/2019.
2019-05-30
Waiver of right of respondents Frankenburg Jensen Law Firm, Carolyn Stevens Jensen, Jenifer M. Brennan to respond filed.
2019-05-28
Waiver of right of respondents Keith Kelly and Heather Brereton to respond filed.
2019-05-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 24, 2019)
Attorneys
Frankenburg Jensen Law Firm, Carolyn Stevens Jensen, Jenifer M. Brennan
Gregory J. Sanders — Kipp and Christian, P.C., Respondent
Gregory J. Sanders — Kipp and Christian, P.C., Respondent
Keith Kelly and Heather Brereton
J. Clifford Petersen — Utah Attorney General's Office, Respondent
J. Clifford Petersen — Utah Attorney General's Office, Respondent