No. 18-1466
County of Sonoma, California, et al. v. Rafael Mateos Sandoval, et al.
Amici (1)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: 4th-amendment constitutional-rights continued-detention detention due-process fourth-amendment lawful-seizure monell-liability municipal-liability property-rights property-seizure public-safety section-1983 seizure vehicle-impound
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity FourthAmendment DueProcess CriminalProcedure
SocialSecurity FourthAmendment DueProcess CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Fourth Amendment can be violated by the government's mere continued detention of property even though its full-blown seizure satisfied the Fourth Amendment
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Continued municipality liable for its enforcement under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Monell v. Dept. of Social Services, 436 U.S. 658 (1978).
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-08-19
Reply of petitioners County of Sonoma, et al. filed.
2019-08-07
Brief of respondent Rafael Mateos Sandoval in opposition filed.
2019-07-08
Response Requested. (Due August 7, 2019)
2019-06-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-06-24
Waiver of right of respondents Rafael Mateos Sandoval, et al. to respond filed.
2019-06-21
Brief amicus curiae of California State Association of Counties filed.
2019-05-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 24, 2019)
Attorneys
California State Association of Counties
County of Sonoma, et al.
Anne L. Keck — Keck Law Offices, Petitioner
Anne L. Keck — Keck Law Offices, Petitioner
Rafael Mateos Sandoval, et al.
Samantha Reiss Koerner — Law Office of Donald W. Cook, Respondent
Samantha Reiss Koerner — Law Office of Donald W. Cook, Respondent