No. 18-1476

Randy Lee Carney v. United States

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-05-28
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: alternative-sentence alternative-sentencing appellate-review career-offender circuit-split collateral-consequences criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing district-court-discretion guidelines harmless-error judicial-discretion judicial-error legal-error sentencing sentencing-guidelines sentencing-guidelines-error united-states-v-vonn
Key Terms:
Environmental AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

When sentencing defendants, some district courts announce that they would impose the same length of imprisonment even if their conclusions of law and calculation of the Sentencing Guidelines range are later found to be in error, does that alternative sentence render any such error harmless, even though the error had serious consequences collateral to the length of imprisonment?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED When sentencing defendants, some district courts announce that they would impose the same length of imprisonment even if their conclusions of law and calculation of the Sentencing Guidelines range are later found to be in error. Does that alternative sentence render any such error harmless, even though the error had serious consequences collateral to the length of imprisonment?

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-06-03
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-05-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 27, 2019)

Attorneys

Randy Lee Carney
Mark R. SigmonSigmon Law, PLLC, Petitioner
Mark R. SigmonSigmon Law, PLLC, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent