Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the Third Circuit Court of Appeals erroneously concluded, in conflict with all other circuit courts to have addressed this issue, that Respondent, who was no longer serving his state sentence of probation at the time he filed his federal habeas corpus petition and is only subject to the mandates of Pennsylvania's Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA), met the jurisdictional "in custody" requirement for federal habeas review?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Third Circuit Court of Appeals erroneously concluded that the respondent, who was no longer serving his state sentence of probation at the time he filed his federal habeas corpus petition and is only subject to the mandates of Pennsylvania's Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA), met the jurisdictional 'in custody' requirement for federal habeas review
2019-10-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/1/2019.
2019-09-30
Brief of respondent Jason Piasecki in opposition filed.
2019-09-03
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including September 30, 2019.
2019-08-28
Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 30, 2019 to September 30, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-07-31
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including August 30, 2019.
2019-07-29
Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 31, 2019 to August 30, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-06-28
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 31, 2019.
2019-06-25
Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 1, 2019 to July 31, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-05-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 1, 2019)