No. 18-1491
Kaitlyn Nguyen v. United States
Response Waived
Tags: 5th-amendment constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process evidence evidence-admissibility evidence-admission fifth-amendment inflammatory-evidence medical-clinic patient-deaths prejudicial-evidence prosecutorial-misconduct
Key Terms:
Securities
Securities
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether petitioner's right to due process of law under the 5th Amendment, U.S. Constitution was violated by the prosecution's introduction of highly inflammatory in the extreme, irrelevant and stunningly prejudicial evidence of dead clinic patients
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether petitioner’s right to due process of law under the 5th Amendment, U.S. Constitution was violated by the prosecution’s introduction of highly inflammatory in the extreme, irrelevant and stunningly prejudicial evidence of dead clinic patients?
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-06-03
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-05-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 28, 2019)
Attorneys
Kaitlyn Nguyen
H. Dean Steward — H. Dean Steward, APC, Petitioner
H. Dean Steward — H. Dean Steward, APC, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent