Whether jurists of reason could debate that a district court must evaluate the merits of a potential motion to suppress where the defendant pled guilty to determine if counsel's pre-plea advice was reasonable and the defendant was prejudiced as a result?

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether jurists of reason could debate that a district court must evaluate the merits of a potential motion to suppress where the defendant pled guilty to determine if counsel’s pre-plea advice was reasonable and the defendant was prejudiced as a result? ii PARTIES Michael Beeman is the Petitioner; he was the defendant-appellant below. The United States of America is the Respondent; it was the plaintiff-appellee below.